therecruitmentjunction.co.uk

Evidence and document archive

This archive gathers investigations, FOI results, Equality Act material, and preserved PDFs about The Recruitment Junction, charity number 1191442. It is maintained by The Reasonable Adjustment and hosted on infrastructure managed by Ki-Ki.

Everything is published in the public interest so that funders, commissioners, trustees, journalists, and service users can see what was said, when it was said, and how that compares to the documentary record.

• Featured investigations
• Public funding and grants
• Equality and safeguarding
• FOI results
• Preserved documents
• Public statements
• Brand and policies
• FAQ

Featured investigations

• The £130,000+ Lie: Beverley Brooks – CEO of The Recruitment Junction Investigation into public funding statements with documentary proof of awards exceeding one hundred and thirty thousand pounds. Includes dates and cross checks.
  FundingGovernance
• When Christian Values Stop at the Door: A Dissection of The Recruitment Junction’s Response Contrasts stated values with safeguarding and equality practice, including service withdrawal and public messaging.
  SafeguardingCulture
• Domain Ownership Notice How domain ownership is used to anchor accountability and route search traffic to evidence-based reporting instead of marketing copy.
  DigitalTransparency

Public funding and grants

• Charity Says “No Public Funding” – The Paper Trail Suggests Otherwise Audit of public claims against the grants record. Confirms awards, providers, and dates with links to source files.
  FundingFOI
• Fact Check: Does The Recruitment Junction Receive Public Funding? Plain-language fact check pulling together FOI responses and grant paperwork to answer the funding question clearly.
  Fact checkGrants
• TRJ Funding Sources, 2020 to 2025 Structured table of grantmakers and amounts totalling £542,900, with a separate line for unattributed sums and live links to GrantNav and GrantVis.
  DatasetCross check

Equality, disability and safeguarding

• Blocked, Silenced, Ignored: My Experience with Unlawful Email Blocking Evidence that multiple email addresses were blocked while GDPR and Equality Act requests were active. Covers dates, headers, and impact on a disabled service user.
  Equality ActGDPR
• Disability Confident Status Confirmed in Ongoing Case Verifies Disability Confident status and explains why it raises the bar for reasonable adjustments and fair treatment.
  DisabilityCompliance
• I Must Not Tell Lies Editorial on institutional honesty with references to statements that required correction for accuracy.
  EditorialAccountability
• The Spark That Lit The Fire – Beverley Brooks Timeline of early contact and the moment a small complaint escalated into a wider governance and safeguarding review.
  TimelineSafeguarding

FOI results and oversight

• Newcastle City Council vs North East Combined Authority – FOI Responses Compares local authority responses on funding and oversight. Highlights inconsistencies and confirms the presence of public money in the mix.
  FOIGovernance

Preserved documents and PDFs

Files are text-based where possible for accessibility and search indexing. File names are kept descriptive so they can be cited easily in complaints, letters, or internal reviews.

• Grant Monitoring Form – Impact Report (PDF) Small grants monitoring return evidencing receipt and use of public funds. Useful for cross checking funding statements and outcomes.
• Confirmation of Acceptance of Grant Award – Redacted (PDF) Redacted award acceptance confirming grant terms and dates. Supports the funding timeline.
• Polite Email Correspondence (PDF) Rights-based email demonstrating reasonable tone and clear requests for adjustments and compliance.
• Service Withdrawal Email – Redacted (PDF) Records the decision to withdraw support shortly after feedback was raised. Forms part of the safeguarding record.

Public statements versus documentary record

These comparisons look at what was said publicly and how that lines up with underlying documents. Each PDF is paired with a deeper web page so people can see context, timestamps, and citations.

• LinkedIn Statements vs Record – Redacted (PDF) Side by side capture of LinkedIn claims against grant awards, programme timelines, and formal records. Useful for fact checking funding narratives and role descriptions.
  StatementsVerification
  Read the deep dive analysis →
• YouTube Claims vs Evidence – Part 1 (PDF) Transcript extracts mapped to dates and documents. Checks consistency with grant paperwork, policy positions, and earlier public posts.
  VideoFact check
  Read the deep dive analysis →
• YouTube Claims vs Evidence – Part 2 (PDF) Follow on analysis with additional timestamps. Highlights corrections requested and unresolved discrepancies.
  VideoCorrections
  Read the deep dive analysis →

Brand and central policies

This archive is part of The Reasonable Adjustment’s public interest reporting. Branding, editorial policy and legal disclaimers are maintained centrally: Digital activism overview · Domain ownership notice · Privacy policy · Legal disclaimer · Terms of use.

Nothing on this page is legal or medical advice. Trademarks belong to their owners. To request a correction, provide the exact URL, the disputed line, and your supporting source.

Frequently asked questions

What is The Recruitment Junction’s charity number?
The Recruitment Junction is registered with the Charity Commission under number 1191442. See the register entry linked above.

Is this page operated by The Recruitment Junction?
No. This archive is independently curated by The Reasonable Adjustment and is not affiliated with The Recruitment Junction.

Where are the editorial policies and disclaimers?
They are maintained on The Reasonable Adjustment’s site and linked above, including the privacy policy, legal disclaimer, and terms of use.